Thursday, March 29, 2018

Divided nation debates arming teachers K-12

By Dymond Sam

SAN MARCOS, Texas — Members of congress are advocating to arm grade school teachers. As this ideology spreads across the United States, its citizens debate whether the safety of our children would be in the right hands.

The school shooting in Parkland, Florida, prompted President Trump’s proposal to arm grade school teachers on Feb. 22. Trump is also considering monetary bonuses for “school guardians” who undergo required training, causing havoc among taxpaying critics. While state legislatures debate the bill, Texas State students and school officials consider funding for training, alternatives to the problem and the possible dangers of arming teachers.

As of Thursday, Gun Violence Archive reported a total of 52 shootings in 2018. On Saturday, anti-gun supporters participated in “March for Our Lives”, a movement intended to expedite the process of stricter gun control.

Evan Brieden
Photo by Dymond Sam
Evan Brieden, a Texas State student, recognizes the recent school shootings as a terrible tragedy but says that it has not reshaped his stance on gun laws.

“If someone wants to get a gun, they’re gonna get a gun. They can get them through back allies and stuff like that, so it’s just hard to regulate. It’s hard to come up with a process to fix that,” says Brieden.

Guns in grade schools are not unheard of. A study by Texas Association of School Boards and Texas Education Service Center recorded that 17 percent of Texas school districts have adopted a policy that permits armed employees. Eight states allow concealed carry of firearms in grade schools or have no law prohibiting it, according to Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Jayla Dunbar
Photo by Dymond Sam
Some districts, such as the Garden Valley School District, allow trained staff members to have access to guns that are locked away in case of an emergency.
Texas State communication studies major Jayla Dunbar thinks that more incidences would occur if students are made aware of who possesses the firearms and where they keep them.
"I think it should just be a select few and they should be low-key so no one knows they have a gun," Dunbar said. "I think when people are aware, that's how more things end up happening."
According to USA Today, the training to become a “school guardian” includes over 80 hours of firearm instruction and active shooter scenarios. Drug tests and psychological evaluations are also required.

Otto Glenewinkel
Photo by Ashley Bowerman
University police officer Otto Glenewinkel says that teachers have enough on their plates, and if a bad guy gets into a classroom, then the institution's security plan has already failed them.

“I think it’s a bad idea because teachers have enough stuff to do with teaching, and I don’t think they need to be worrying about keeping the school safe,” Glenewinkel said. “Would I want a teacher to have a gun if a bad guy was in the room and my son was there and the teacher was the last person in between my son dying and the bad guy? Absolutely. Teachers aren’t the ones who should be securing the schools.”

The price tag on school safety measures are not cheap. Brookings analyst Michael Hansen gave CNBC an estimate of $650 million or $1,000 per teacher a year to train. Many critics prefer schools to hire more school resource officers than to arm teachers. Former GOP house speaker Newt Gingrich proposed hiring 6-8 armed guards in every school. The Washington Post analysis found that this alternative fell between $63 billion and $84 billion.
Nathaniel Mendoza
Photo by Shanell Smith and Payton Samudio
Texas State student and applied math major Nathaniel Mendoza said that the funding for training and guns should come from taxpayers and direct funding to school districts.
I don’t think that taxpayers should have to pay the full amount,” said Mendoza. “But it’s your kids, your community, you should help pay.”
Danielle Kelly
Photo by Dymond Sam
While some are advocating to arm teachers, others are considering less violent alternatives, such as mental health exams, bulletproof whiteboards and Barracuda intruder defense systems.
Danielle Kelly, a Texas State student, had many alternatives in mind.
“Restricting the age limit for guns, restricting who can buy guns, [federal] background checks…. there is so many,” said Kelly. “No bump stocks, no AR-15s, no mass destruction of war that civilians can get a hold of.”
Vangelis Metsis
Photo by Dymond Sam
Texas State computer science system professor Vangelis Metsis compares the number of mass shootings in the United States to incidences in Greece, his home country. He said that there are no guns allowed to the general public, and the rates of mass shooting are slim to none.
“There could be individual shootings when there are two bad guys shooting each other, or, you know, there could be a robbery where one person gets shot, but there are no cases of mass shootings," Metsis said. "Not having access to guns I think that’s the reason for it ... I don’t see a reason to have semi-automatic guns at home. You can have a hunting gun at home for your own protection and that would be enough.”
Support the anti-gun movement by donating and signing petitions. Demand change from U.S. senators and representatives by calling 202-224-3121.





No comments:

Post a Comment